A Better Course

“thou hast councilled a better course than thou hast allowed”

A Better Course header image 1

links for 2008-01-30

January 31st, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-30

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-30Categories: links
Tags:

links for 2008-01-29

January 30th, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-29

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-29Categories: links
Tags:

The New Productivity

January 29th, 2008 · 3 Comments

Some fascinating research from MIT Sloan today; Understanding productivity in the Information Age. The project consisted of analysing data from emails on a single company’s network:

As part of a study of an executive recruiting firm conducted over a five-year period, the researchers were able to analyze ten months of the firm’s e-mail traffic. While the content of the recruiting firms’ e-mails was encrypted […] the research team could track the flow of particular encrypted words through the firm’s e-mail network. The researchers then correlated those findings with data […] about factors such as individual workers’ project workload, project completion time and compensation

All the results in the press release are interesting, but the one that I found most fascinating was:

Workers who received more novel information (as measured by an unusual word appearing in the company’s e-mail traffic and then diffusing through part of the firm’s e-mail network) had measurably higher productivity than others. In this study, encountering just 10 novel words more than the average worker was associated with $700 more in revenue generated per employee.

The whole study has an interesting view on mundanity; I don’t think I’ve read an article in the last year that speaks about email as much other than an irritant, and it’s fairly well ingrained as part of our everyday. The idea that these daily transactions of information contain abstract, important – and, better – identifiable data about how an individual and a company functions is actually quite exciting.

Possibly more importantly, though, is the concept of novel information as something that can be followed through conversations, and through the regular flow of information. From the data given, it looks like this information is as likely to be a new idea as a new project or project update. It would be even better to know how many of the novel ideas here ended up being successful, or if (as I’d expect) the act of having and communicating an idea in itself increased productivity.

→ 3 CommentsCategories: management · network
Tags: , , ,

Self Evidence

January 29th, 2008 · Comments Off on Self Evidence

There’s been a lot written and said recently about brand engagement – essentially, the idea that if someone uses something related to your brand, they will be more likely to trust (and by extension buy) your product further down the line. Even more problematically, this has frequently been with reference to brand’s Facebook applications. I’ve remained cynical about this in general, because it seems to say that your “brand” and your “product” are two different things that can be separated and put back together more or less at the whim of marketers.

In a recent discussion on two brands every marketer loves (that’s Innocent and Apple, in case you hadn’t guessed) I started thinking about the idea of self evidence in opposition to the idea of engagement. Innocent constantly demand engagement – their packaging shows in incredible attention to detail. This can be ignored, to an extent, but it would take superhuman levels of distraction to fail to notice that your juice bottle is wearing a little hat.

None of this speaks about the (quite nice) smoothie itself, however – there’s an extent to which you have to buy into buying a drink that’s wearing a small wooly hat.

Apple’s packaging, by contrast, demands almost no attention. The proof of the quality (the evidence) comes when you use their products; you know it’s good because you know how it feels to use a good product. Apple’s packaging is not without its obsessives, but engagement follows evidence, and not vice versa.

In both of these examples, by the time you’ve got to the packaging you’re quite close to the product itself; the disconnect between the thing that demands engagement and the thing that provides evidence is not great. The idea of engagement is even more problematic when it moves online. Viral campaigns such as those for The Dark Knight and Nine Inch Nails’ Year Zero have justifiably attracted attention; but these are media which were always going to attract an engaged fanbase.

To use a perhaps more typical, and certainly more personally embarassing example, I spent time over the weekend solving the puzzle on Panic At The Disco‘s website. It was well put together, made sense within their brand (keyword: snide), and I was certainly engaged with it. But I’m far from sure it’s made me less likely to describe them as ‘crappy’, ’emo’ or ‘third tier’ because no amount of engagement on my part will make them into anything other than a crappy third tier emo band (and guilty pleasure).

Ultimately, no amount of ‘engagement’, whatever that means to any individual consumer, is going to turn a bad product into a good one. And if your product is a good one, they’ll engage with it on their own terms, to much greater effect.

Comments Off on Self EvidenceCategories: branding · marketing · product
Tags: , , , , , ,

links for 2008-01-28

January 29th, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-28

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-28Categories: links
Tags:

Just What You Need, Part III

January 29th, 2008 · 1 Comment

Matterbox is one of the more fun marketing ideas I’ve seen recently:

Matter is a collection of a dozen or so enticing or intriguing physical things, each one from a different company, occasionally delivered to your house in a distinctive box on a Saturday morning.

I was going to describe it as one of the better ideas, but I’d like to see how well executed the first box is before I go that far. Still, it has all the hallmarks of a superb idea. It’s on your (the consumers’) terms – you ask for it, and if you don’t like anything in the box you get to ignore, recycle or give away whatever’s in it. But if you do like something in it; well, you just found something you like and someone else had a good campaign; I look forward to seeing more from Matter, online as well as in the post.

→ 1 CommentCategories: advertising · marketing
Tags: , , ,

links for 2008-01-27

January 28th, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-27

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-27Categories: links
Tags:

links for 2008-01-25

January 26th, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-25

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-25Categories: links
Tags:

links for 2008-01-24

January 25th, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-24

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-24Categories: links
Tags:

links for 2008-01-22

January 23rd, 2008 · Comments Off on links for 2008-01-22

Comments Off on links for 2008-01-22Categories: links
Tags: